Skip to content

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and you will receive our stories in your inbox.

When the sword is mightier than the pen.

Posted in Uncategorized

Ana JuanI was standing in the line at Woolworths yesterday. It’s an upmarket grocery store in a chi-chi shopping centre in suburbia. I always read the paper while I am waiting and the front page was full of images from the past week. As I put the paper down I noticed the two women in front of me. They were both dressed in the traditional long robes and hijab scarf that I associate with devout Muslims. They had been watching me read. The older woman said: “I am so sorry.”

I smiled at her and shook my head. Trying to convey that I didn’t hold her responsible. But she just looked down at the floor. The younger woman took her arm: “Come Mommy.” As they moved to pay, I saw the daughter glance at the paper. The image of the gunman shooting the policeman as he lay on the floor begging for his life lay between us, like a burnt bridge.

When I got home I ran around the web some, trying to piece together the cartoon history that had set the two brothers on their deadly path. There was a lot. And, I have to be honest, as deeply and fiercely protective as I am of the universal right to freedom of speech; I found some of the drawings distasteful. Muhammad was depicted in various graphic, sometimes sexual, often naked positions. And, while I couldn’t fully understand the French, and so possibly lost out on the humour – it all felt a little teenage, gratuitous, Mad-magazine-ish.

It also felt like hate-speech. I mean, who exactly were they targeting?

I wondered how Catholics opening the Daily Mail would feel about a cartoon of a leprechaun being anally rended by Jesus, as the Pope watched? Or Jews on discovering Abraham drawn pleasuring a bull in the op-ed section of The Palestine Chronicle?

The thing about satire is it needs context, taking it out of the magazine and sharing it all over the internet removes context.

A number of respected news outlets around the world have elected not to print or post the most controversial of the cartoons. NPR, The New York Times and the Washington Post have used their editorial boards to review the contents. Something they do on a regular basis – when material is potentially offensive because of religious, racial or sexual content. The NPR clarified their decision: “Just because offensive images are part of a story does not mean a news organisation must publish or post them with its news reports”.  In other words: we will report it – because that is our duty, but we will not inflame or titilate – because that is not our way.

That’s not to say we shouldn’t be allowed to view the cartoons, should we choose to. I did, and I found them easily enough. But here’s the thing- slamming the beehive with a giant stick is only going to infuriate the bees. And, like extremists, they will swarm and sting until someone stops them. That’s partly what happened here.

Perhaps it’s time for a re-evaluation of what we are prepared to read, see, watch or put up with. To start a discussion as to why certain sections of our community aren’t able to laugh at unflattering images of themselves. Is it, perhaps, because that is all they ever see? We can’t just ignore how this story played out. If we do it’s going to happen again. And we’re going to devolve into a separated society, an ‘us and them’, an apartheid. To pretend something isn’t profoundly wrong is fatal. We’ve all see how that movie ends.

Cherif and Said Kouachi claim to have been members of Al-Quaeda. Boko Haram killed 2000 people in Nigeria over the weekend and sent a ten-year old girl, small body strapped with explosives – into a market where she detonated her bomb. These are not acts of worship: they are the actions of fanatics who think they have the right to eradicate anyone who doesn’t agree with them. While they say they have committed these atrocities in defence of their religion, these people are the monsters. The Prophet is not.

Lassana Bathily, a Muslim employee at Paris Kosher grocery store Hyper Cacher, who saved several people by hiding them in a walk-in freezer when a gunman laid siege to his workplace on Friday, cut to the chase: “We are brothers. It’s not a question of Jews, of Christians or of Muslims. We’re all in the same boat, we have to help each other to get out of this crisis.”

We would be charlies not to.

(Image of front cover of next week’s New Yorker drawn by Ana Juan. Copyright The New Yorker.)

Share on Facebook

5 Comments

  1. Thank you for your thoughtful piece. I felt as you did when viewing the cartoons. I couldn’t think how to write about it though. Nice job.

    January 14, 2015
    |Reply
  2. sofagirl
    sofagirl

    The scary thing about satire out of context is that people take it seriously. I watch people share stories from outlets like The Onion – and their horror and disbelief and the immediate jump to finger pointing. My Facebook friends are sick of me reminding them to ‘check the provenance’ of the news. But it is key. Interestingly – Nigeria goes to the polls soon, their President spoke at a rally over the weekend: promising to improve the way oil is mined and the money shared. Not a word about Boko Haram. Says it all.

    January 13, 2015
    |Reply
  3. So good, so important to discuss. I’m struggling here.
    Ive been talking with my French husband all weekend. He was born in Paris in the early 50’s and watched it taken over by North African immigrants, starting in the 60’s and 70’s. He is not a fan, and has a mild form of PTSD from the subway bombings they had back then, when he was a young man.
    We have debated it thoughtfully…carefully. While I will be the first one to stand up for free speech, the cartoons in question are meant to humiliate. They are satire of a religious figure who’s followers believe should never be drawn or pictured. No one deserves to die for this. EVER. Let me be clear about that. But with words (and pictures) comes a responsibility. (You and I are both bloggers, I know I feel a responsibility for everything I put out in the world, F-Bombs and all). What was the response they were after?
    The Muslims in Paris are completely disenfranchised, as my husband tells me. They are not considered French,(even if they were born there) they are mostly poor, undereducated, and it is nearly impossible for them to find gainful employment.
    Satire is a medium for intellectuals. If you get it, it may be humorous, if you have to explain it, it’s not funny.
    We can’t ignore hate disguised as free speech.

    January 12, 2015
    |Reply
    • winston moreton
      winston moreton

      In the Gisborne Herald today there is call to scrap blasphemy laws in NZ because human rights legislation already balanced free speech against freedom from discrimination and hate speech. Fair call I would have thought.

      January 13, 2015
      |Reply
      • sofagirl
        sofagirl

        Fair Call indeed – and wonderful if upheld.

        January 13, 2015
        |Reply

Got some thoughts? We would love to hear what you think

%d bloggers like this: